Want to know why we support HS2? What’s the evidence that it’s a good thing for Greens?
What about the arguments against? How many are valid and how many exaggerated or misleading? Some myths busted.
The prevailing narrative about HS2 is that it runs counter to Green transport objectives. Several reasons are cited, most commonly that it is energy-intensive, destructive of habitat, aimed at rich travellers, and taking up funds that could be more effectively used for local transport. Of course, we have responses to… Read More »HS2 supports Green transport objectives
Here are the 5 main reasons why you should vote for motion E01 Green Strategy for the Midlands and North. 1 The North wants and needs new railways The north of England hasn’t had a new railway line for decades. The South East, by contrast, has been transformed by new… Read More »5 reasons why you should vote for E01
As Greens we share with all our party colleagues a huge respect for the natural world and a love of our country’s woodland and the wildlife it supports. We mourn the loss of ancient woodland wherever it happens. HS2 sadly causes the loss of some of this woodland. However, one… Read More »108 ancient woodlands destroyed?
All transportation infrastructure projects emit CO2 when being built, but only trains earn that CO2 back, because when people switch from high-CO2 modes like cars and planes, the only question is “how long” until it’s all earned back and we start getting gains. Carbon Brief wrote a brilliant piece showing… Read More »The carbon numbers: what is the full potential of HS2?
This piece of original research by Mark Brewer MEng shows how the 120-year myth about HS2’s carbon payback is exactly that.
Below is a copy of the Briefing Note reproduced at http://stophs2.org/news/1562-green-partys-high-speed-rail-briefing-note, retrieved February 11th 2021. We cannot currently verify it is identical to the briefing note actually issued at the GPEW Spring Conference in 2011 and relied upon to pass Conference motion TR11.3. If anyone does have an authoritative link… Read More »Reference: Green Party’s High Speed Rail Briefing Note, 2011
Some objections to HS2 are because people have heard that it will stimulate air travel. After all, it’s supported by, and has stations near, Birmingham and Manchester airports. Of course we Greens want much less air travel, not more, so how can we support HS2? HS2 is not about airports.… Read More »Stimulate air travel?
We know many very committed Greens are involved in these protests against HS2, concerned about the loss of habitat and woodland. We respect their dedication, but they’re protesting about the wrong thing. The real enemy is the government’s vast RIS2 road-building programme. Unlike RIS2, HS2 is an investment in a… Read More »RIS2: The real enemy is roads
HS2’s drilling and tunnelling into the chalk rock below its route has many people worried about drinking water supplies, and chalk streams such as the River Misbourne. This is an engineering challenge, but there isn’t a reason to be alarmed. It’s not a venture into the unknown. A few words… Read More »Chalk streams and drinking water
“All this, just to get to Birmingham 20 minutes quicker”, people say. Nope: on the day that HS2 starts, in 2029, its trains will also serve Liverpool, Manchester and Glasgow. Here’s the service pattern. Each line = one train per hour both ways: The trains run on the new railway… Read More »“Just for 20 minutes quicker to Birmingham”